moneydeer7 posted an update 1 month, 2 weeks ago
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn’t enough to stream.
Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.
When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).
Web app is supported. It’s rudimentary, but it’s possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as another cloud is concerned).
It includes a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.
In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only has to be in a folder.
You need to share a URL which means you can’t share music files or videos.
According to the report, there exists a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It’s a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It’s much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***
It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play up to 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it’s often cut off at that point)
It includes a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it really is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it’s about once every two hours. And when you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn’t smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it’s in that state, you have to discover the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.
It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud instantly. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.
It is easy to connect to other Google services such as for example Gmail.
Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file does not account for cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos could be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), nonetheless it doesn’t bother me.
There are probably the most apps that can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It’s a tiny problem that the app doesn’t connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.
Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is no bandwidth restriction in name.
웹하드 순위 There is a testimony that it is a block after a lot of writing, but it isn’t stipulated by company policy.
If you use Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and work with MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs applied to computers.Could it be obvious?)
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, it is possible to freely specify until the start of playback. It’s the best in the world with regards to media reading.
There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn’t work with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit which can be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB each day. It’s practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.
The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards…
There is a saying that changes in documents cannot be reflected in real time when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn’t flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and work on it leisurely.
In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the web page’s resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is very disadvantageous. It’s a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it’s disadvantageous above. It’s better to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that can only be written on Box (it works, so it’s better than Dropbox, but it’s significantly less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***
The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive’s is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we’ve often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn’t that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.